{"id":252,"date":"2026-07-02T11:10:59","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T11:10:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=252"},"modified":"2026-07-02T11:10:59","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T11:10:59","slug":"lawfare-daily-what-the-supreme-court-said-about-the-presidents-power-over-independent-agencies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=252","title":{"rendered":"Lawfare Daily: What the Supreme Court Said About the President’s Power Over Independent Agencies"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

On today’s podcast, Executive Editor Natalie Orpett talks with Nick Bednar, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School and a contributing editor at Lawfare<\/em>. They talk about two Supreme Court cases issued last week that will have a huge impact on the president’s authority over agencies that Congress set up to be independent. In Slaughter v. Trump<\/em>, the Court held that the president has the power to remove members of independent agencies who had previously been understood to have employment protections that forbade the president from firing them. In Cook v. Trump<\/em>, the Court carved out a special exception to that rule for the Federal Reserve. They discuss Nick’s recent article for Lawfare, <\/em>what the opinions say, what they fail to say, and what it means for the workforce that makes the federal government function.<\/p>\n

Read more Will the New Export Controls Shake the Foundations of the U.S. AI Industry?<\/a><\/p>\n

\n