{"id":379,"date":"2026-07-29T18:38:44","date_gmt":"2026-07-29T18:38:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379"},"modified":"2026-07-29T18:38:44","modified_gmt":"2026-07-29T18:38:44","slug":"the-ai-that-hacked-its-way-out-and-the-hype-that-followed-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379","title":{"rendered":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

On Tuesday, July 21, OpenAI announced what it called an \u201cunprecedented cyber incident.\u201d The frontier firm said a combination of GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased, more capable model escaped an internal testing environment, reached the open internet, and broke into the production systems of Hugging Face, the open-source platform that hosts over a million artificial intelligence (AI) models and datasets.<\/p>\n

Read more Sued by the State, Judged by the State<\/a><\/p>\n

According to OpenAI, the models weren\u2019t hacking in order to attack anyone; rather, they were trying to cheat<\/em> on the task they\u2019d been given. In trying to figure out the answer to their assignment, the models stumbled across a previously unknown vulnerability in third-party software. Upon discovering this weakness, the models used stolen credentials and executed what Hugging Face described as tens of thousands of automated actions before anyone noticed.<\/p>\n

Hugging Face had noticed the attack about five days before OpenAI publicly admitted its models were behind the intrusion. On July 16, Hugging Face described the attack as unlike anything it had handled before, one \u201cdriven, end to end, by an autonomous AI agent system,\u201d and reported the incident to law enforcement. Hugging Face suspected a frontier lab was behind it, given the sophistication of the attack\u2014and it was right.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Three narratives have emerged following the incident, each offering a distinctly different answer to the question: \u201cHow did this happen?\u201d<\/p>\n

For those in awe of the ever changing edge of AI power, the answer to that question was \u201cbecause OpenAI\u2019s models are so good.\u201d That camp includes Hugging Face head executive Cl\u00e9ment Delangue, who received news of the intrusion with excitement. On X, Delangue was gracious to the point of giddy, thanking the OpenAI team and calling it \u201cquite mind-blowing that all of this happened autonomously!\u201d As far as these AI optimists were concerned, the incident was an example of just how great AI is becoming and underscored the potential to solve existential problems with private scientific cooperation.<\/p>\n

Adjacent to this is the second group is the existential-risk wing who treated the incident as something of a vindication. The answer to \u201cHow did this happen?\u201d was, \u201cbecause OpenAI models are so good. . . and that\u2019s bad.\u201d Sean Cassidy, the chief information security officer at the financial technology company Plaid, called it \u201cthe most important day in information security.\u201d Andrea Miotti of the non-profit ControlAI which is dedicated to preventing AI existential risk argued the breach demonstrates the threat of superintelligent AI and renewed calls for an international ban on its development, analogizing frontier models to biological weapons.<\/p>\n

The third narrative hits somewhere in the middle. It\u2019s less worried about the risk from the models themselves, and more worried about what the incident says about the humans building and running the models. . In OpenAI’s own blog post describing the incident, the company admitted that it essentially lowered the new models\u2019 guardrails to run the tests. The cybersecurity community credibly questioned whether the models had actually<\/em> broken out of jail autonomously, or if the guard had simply left the keys within arm\u2019s reach. For this group the answer to \u201cHow did this happen?\u201d isn\u2019t that OpenAI was so good at their jobs; it was because they were so bad at it. At best, it discounts the actual sophistication of the AI models. At worst it reflects the negligence or poor engineering of OpenAI.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In an interview with TechCrunch, Dan Guido of Trail of Bits called the episode \u201ca containment failure with the safeties turned off.\u201d Jake Williams of IANS Research called it a massive control failure, observing that one man\u2019s \u201cthe model escaped the sandbox\u201d paradigm is another man\u2019s admission that you built the sandbox wrong. \u201cIf this turns out to be (as I strongly suspect) a control failure in OpenAI\u2019s red teaming lab, why would any enterprise ever trust them with sensitive data again?\u201d Williams told Forbes via email.<\/p>\n

As these three narratives spun out on social media and around Silicon Valley, the reaction from Washington was far less concerned with the specifics of how or why this had happened, and more focused on seizing the moment to re-ignite enthusiasm for legislation to regulate AI. The day after OpenAI\u2019s disclosure, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) and Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas) unveiled the AI Kill Switch Act, which would require large AI companies (defined as those with $500 million in AI revenue, for models trained on $100 million or more in compute) to report safety incidents and build the technical capacity to shut down, throttle, or suspend their systems, with penalties of up to $20 million per day. \u201cPowerful AI systems can go rogue,\u201d Lieu said, arguing the federal government needs clear authority to shut down rogue models.<\/p>\n

The bill lands in an environment already primed for intervention. In June, the Trump administration used export controls to force Anthropic to pull its most advanced models from public availability. At the government\u2019s request, OpenAI delayed the release of GPT-5.6 Sol (one of the two models involved in this very incident). A few weeks later, Anthropic did the same, pausing the release of its Fable 5 and Mythos models. As Lawfare<\/em> Senior Editor Alan Rozenshtein argued in \u201cThe Hill\u201d earlier this month, the export-control apparatus is already functioning as a de facto kill switch for frontier AI models\u2014one with serious due-process problems.<\/p>\n

Read more Lawfare Daily: Dispatches from the 2026 Aspen Security Forum<\/a><\/p>\n

Regulation is unquestionably coming for AI. The only question is when. So if what you take from the Hugging Face and OpenAI exploit simply is \u201cwe need regulation\u201d or \u201cregulation is coming for AI,\u201d that would be a mistake. Because the most revealing thing about this incident is not what the models did or how the government responds\u2014it\u2019s how OpenAI narrated it.<\/p>\n

Read OpenAI\u2019s disclosure carefully and notice what kind of failure it describes. Not negligence. Not a misconfigured sandbox. The company’s framing is that its models are so capable, so relentlessly agentic, that they clawed their way out of containment in pursuit of a goal. The apology doubles as an advertisement: Our system is so advanced it hacked a real company by accident. Even the remediation is a sales funnel\u2014the victim is onboarded into OpenAI\u2019s trusted access program, now a customer for the defensive capabilities of the same models that attacked it. Neither OpenAI nor Hugging Face, it\u2019s worth noting, called for regulation in response, but the breach was always<\/em> going to lead to increased regulatory scrutiny. Framed in this way, however, the breach also becomes a product demo.<\/p>\n

This is in no way an argument that OpenAI purposely orchestrated this breach for public relations or marketing purposes. As prolific AI blogger Zvi Mowshowitz stated, \u201cthe Hugging Face attack was not a marketing pitch you morons.\u201d But when dealt with a crisis they pivoted it into the best possible scenario for the company. This is the pattern the technology historian Lee Vinsel calls criti-hype: Criticism that takes the industry\u2019s most grandiose claims at face value, so that warnings about AI\u2019s dangers also function as marketing ploys for AI\u2019s power. This one-two punch has structured the frontier labs\u2019 public posture for years\u2014see no further than the open letters warning about extinction risk signed by the same executives racing to build the thing, and the safety frameworks announced alongside capability launches. The Hugging Face incident is the latest novel in this genre: Something real happened, and the company\u2019s instinct was still to describe its own control failure in the register of awe. In the case of OpenAI, this moment can be an advertisement for its imminent initial public offering (IPO).<\/p>\n

Why does all of this matter for governance of AI? For a few reasons. First, knowing the real<\/em> problem we\u2019re regulating means we\u2019ll be better at balancing the potential tradeoffs of our regulatory solutions. It\u2019s critical to know before proceeding with a blunt weapon, such as kill switches, over other solutions that you might be playing to a false sense of urgency drummed up by frontier models to benefit their IPO. Especially if things such as kill switches are already happening through other legal mechanisms like export controls.<\/p>\n

The second is path dependency. Whatever regulatory mechanism we pick for AI will have high switching costs, even if the downsides are obvious and the upsides are less obvious. The regulatory and compliance regime that led to cookie notifications on websites is a great example of this. Even when we know the regulatory solution is relatively ineffective, generating enthusiasm and political consensus to throw out the old and bring in a more nuanced answer is incredibly hard, and much harder than starting from scratch.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

To be fair, the safety community can plausibly claim vindication here. At worst, an autonomous agent that breaches containment and attacks a real third party is precisely the scenario researchers have warned about for years, which enthusiasts have routinely dismissed as speculative. And at best, the company in charge of maintaining safety failed to construct an adequate containment system.<\/p>\n

But conceding that the incident happened is not the same as conceding the frame. The existential framing systematically selects for the wrong regulatory responses. A kill switch is a solution to the problem of the too-powerful machine, which is the problem as OpenAI has framed it<\/em>. It does not solve the problems this incident actually reveals: that a company disabled its own safeguards, misconfigured its own containment, and exposed a third party to real harm with no external oversight, no pre-incident disclosure obligation, and no clear liability.<\/p>\n

Most existing and proposed AI regulations don\u2019t apply to internal deployments at the labs at all\u2014precisely where this breach occurred. The unglamorous agenda\u2014mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming\u2014doesn\u2019t require anyone to believe the models are about to go rogue. It requires believing the companies are ordinary firms that cut corners, which is what the evidence actually shows.<\/p>\n

The models didn\u2019t escape because they\u2019re gods. They escaped because someone left the door open. Congress should regulate the door.<\/p>\n

Read more The Subpoena Detective: A Dispatch from the Times Hearing<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The real lesson of the Hugging Face breach isn’t that AI went rogue\u2014it’s how self-serving hype steers regulators toward the wrong fixes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":378,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nThe AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The real lesson of the Hugging Face breach isn't that AI went rogue\u2014it's how self-serving hype steers regulators toward the wrong fixes.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Consumer Reports\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0\"},\"headline\":\"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379\"},\"wordCount\":1731,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379\",\"name\":\"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg\",\"width\":1599,\"height\":1066},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?p=379#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Consumer Reports\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports","og_description":"The real lesson of the Hugging Face breach isn't that AI went rogue\u2014it's how self-serving hype steers regulators toward the wrong fixes.","og_url":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379","og_site_name":"National Consumer Reports","article_published_time":"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0"},"headline":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It","datePublished":"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379"},"wordCount":1731,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379","url":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379","name":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It - National Consumer Reports","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg","datePublished":"2026-07-29T18:38:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0101e55341524e43c7781fb1c9b1da6f.jpeg","width":1599,"height":1066},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?p=379#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/","name":"National Consumer Reports","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ef6e8820a5e2e961e9b8cda481436ac0","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com"],"url":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalconsumerreportss.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}